Skip to main content
    For DAF holders, venture capital & small foundations

    You are making real decisions
    on an incomplete picture.

    Criteria matter. So do proximity, history, definitions of evidence, networks, culture, politics, and discretion. Those conditions shape the outcome whether or not they appear in the guidelines. The question underneath is simple: what is your capital model unable to see?

    Start an institutional conversationRequest a readiness briefSee the Institutional StudioGet the free Capital Entry ToolkitIf you invest or back ventures, read this instead

    DSG is an operating prototype for fair philanthropy and a new architecture for social return on investment — not a universally proven model. Accountability runs in more than one direction: capital providers, intermediaries, and communities each carry real but different responsibilities, and none of them are optional.

    Recognition

    Six questions worth answering internally.

    • Are the same organizations repeatedly rising to the top?
    • Are your application requirements producing better decisions, or better paperwork?
    • Does your staff know the criteria but still lack structured community intelligence — what the community already knows, organized well enough to use?
    • Are you asking partners for data you know how to interpret?
    • Does the portfolio add up to a strategy, or to a habit?
    • Where could community intelligence actually change the decision?

    This is a systems review, not an accusation. The goal is not a softer standard. It is a decision that reflects what is actually there.

    Three kinds of capital

    What we work on, and what you leave with.

    Donor-Advised Fund (DAF) holders

    The capital is already yours. The question is what your giving is built to recognize.

    DAF giving is usually anonymous by design. What if it didn't have to be? What if you gave $5,000 and watched it become something specific — tutoring for a real number of kids, on a real Tuesday, in a real room? Before that happens, DSG does the work you can't do from where you sit: we look at the organization's books, track record, actual capacity. We tell you honestly what we find. Then we connect your capital to the people doing the work — not to an agency that decides on your behalf what the community needs. Somewhere between a donor's decision and a community, giving keeps turning into charity — even when that's not how it started. That transformation isn't inevitable. It's a design flaw. DSG exists to close the distance instead.

    The money is not scarce. Here is what's actually happening to it:

    • Community foundations nationally hold $159B in assets and gave over $16.5B in grants in 2024 (Council on Foundations / CF Insights)
    • Across 25 major community foundations, overall per-capita giving averages $78/person — but only $6/person reaches Black communities (NCRP, "Black Funding Denied")
    • Human-service nonprofits get 65% of their revenue from government contracts, not donors (Urban Institute)
    • Nonprofit leadership remains 80–90% white at the largest organizational scale (Building Movement Project, "Race to Lead")

    What we work on

    • What your current giving pattern is structured to see, and what it never reaches
    • How to move money to grassroots and neighborhood organizations without importing institutional burden
    • Evidence you can actually credit from organizations without a research department
    • A giving sequence instead of one-off gifts

    What you leave with — depending on the engagement

    • A giving thesis and decision rubric
    • Community intelligence protocol
    • A low-burden diligence question bank
    • A twelve-month giving sequence

    The largest philanthropic funds run dedicated readiness work before a dollar moves. Almost no one has built the same discipline for a donor giving $5,000 directly. We built that.

    By engagementBring us a giving decision

    Venture capital & venture-backed community health

    New capital entering a neighborhood can build something better than what came before.

    What we work on

    • Where value is created on the ground, and who is positioned to hold it
    • Deal structure that gives the local operator equity or a real path to ownership
    • Ground-truth diligence before the term sheet, not after the friction
    • How to avoid rebuilding the professional middle under a new name

    What you leave with — depending on the engagement

    • Pre-investment community entry review
    • Operating-partner structure and governance options
    • Ground-truth diligence findings
    • An internal investment brief leadership can defend

    DSG is an advisory and design firm. We do not make, place, or guarantee any investment.

    By engagementBring us a deal before it is signed

    Family & small foundations

    You can see the pipeline. You cannot see what the pipeline never reached.

    What we work on

    • How evidence is defined, and what the process cannot currently credit
    • Where application burden costs you decision quality
    • How community intelligence enters the record in a usable form
    • Whether the portfolio expresses a thesis

    What you leave with — depending on the engagement

    • Strategy map and funding decision rubric
    • Application burden audit
    • Community intelligence protocol
    • Diligence question bank and evidence interpretation guide
    • Learning agenda and decision debrief format
    By engagementBring us a funding decision

    DSG is an advisory and design firm. We do not hold, regrant, or direct your capital, and we take no fiduciary role in your decisions.

    Free toolkit

    The Capital Entry Toolkit.

    A pre-decision review for Donor-Advised Fund holders and venture capital moving into community health. Use it before the gift, and before the term sheet. No cost, no call required, nothing to unlock later.

    Section 1

    Six questions worth answering internally

    The questions we ask in the first institutional conversation, written so your team can run them without us.

    Track A — DAF holders

    What your giving is built to recognize

    A five-part checklist: your last ten gifts, the burden you are importing, the evidence you can credit, whose account counts as a source, and what the second gift funds.

    Track B — Venture capital

    Ten ground-truth checks before the term sheet

    Capital leakage, ownership, underwriting, intake, local procurement, power dynamics, billing flow, staff readiness, retention, and governance parity.

    Section 4

    How to record what you find

    The evidence labels DSG uses internally, so your committee can tell an established fact from a reading of one.

    Send me the toolkit.

    We use your email only to send the toolkit and Field Notes. No sharing.

    Before capital enters a community

    Community-Accountable Investment Entry Review

    Venture capital can enter without rebuilding the professional middle under another name. A good business opportunity should not become a wreck on a community.

    A structured entry review for an investor, fund or corporate partner considering entry into a community, supporting one of four decisions: proceed, redesign, stage, or stop.

    What is delivered

    • Enterprise and community architecture
    • Authority and governance map
    • Ownership and retained-value analysis
    • Knowledge-compensation plan
    • Benefit, risk, displacement and extraction review
    • Evidence and monitoring framework
    • Written recommendations

    What you do

    • Share the deal structure and the intended community
    • Make decision-makers available
    • Accept that stop and redesign are real outcomes

    What DSG does

    • Map the architecture, the authority and the retained value
    • Name risks with their evidence and their limits
    • Recommend, with reasoning

    What this is not

    • No statement that a venture is investable
    • No promise that harm is prevented
    • No diligence opinion and no legal or financial advice
    By conversationOpen a conversation

    Bring us the part of the model you cannot see.

    Institutional inquiries receive a direct response from Fredericka.

    Start an institutional conversationSee the Institutional Studio

    Community Capital Architecture™. We work on the structure underneath the decision — with grassroots, small, identity-based, place-based and neighborhood organizations, and with Donor-Advised Fund (DAF) holders, venture capital moving into community health, and family and small foundations.

    Fredericka Wallace-Deena — Strategist. Community Capital Architect. Founder of Deena Strategic Group

    DSG publications

    Tell us who you are.

    Capital Signal™, Field Notes, and essays — intelligence on where capital moves and what it misses. We would like to know who is in the room.

    No spam. Leave anytime.

    We use your details only to send DSG publications and to know who is in the room. No spam, no sharing. Leave anytime. Privacy.

    Would rather talk than read? Say hello.

    © 2026 Deena Strategic Group™ · All rights reserved.Community Capital Architecture™ · The Underneath™ · Capital Legibility™ · Cultural Signal Extraction™Build 20260930-1946-nogit

    Talk it through with a person

    One question is enough. Tell us where you are, and a person reads it.