Buy the thing you need now. Use it on its own, or use it as your first step into DSG.
Every one of these ends with a finished thing in your hands. Not a template. Not a course. Not a plan for making a plan. Nothing here requires joining a Sprint or a Studio project — deeper help is a choice, not a condition.
You tell us who you are approaching and what you are trying to make possible. You receive a Capital Intelligence Brief™ — the room, the evidence, and the language that room can act on. Reviewed by a person before it reaches you.
Free first: ask a question on the porch — WHY™
Four working routes, from $350 to $750. Each card below carries its own price and what it finishes. There is no federal route, on purpose.
The level comes after. If two sound like you, start with the one that is costing you money right now. Each one is a standalone purchase.
“I do not want my proposal to get me sent to training when what I need is capital.”
Result: We identify and fix the specific things making a capital decision-maker read your organization as not-yet-ready.
Who it is for: Organizations that keep getting referred to readiness or capacity programs instead of funded.
“I did not grow up around money. Help me build legitimate access to larger giving.”
Result: A researched pipeline of larger-giver prospects, connectors, and institutions — with the actual relationship routes to reach them.
Who it is for: Founders with real community trust and no inherited access to wealth.
“My existing community trusts us, but they cannot finance the whole campaign.”
Result: A campaign that converts the trust you already have into introductions, ambassadors, matches, recurring giving, and access beyond your current circle.
Who it is for: Organizations whose donor list is loyal, generous, and too small.
“Write this grant like I have a researcher, evaluator, financial analyst, strategist, and grants director working with me.”
Result: A complete, evidence-bearing, properly costed grant package built to survive a real review.
Who it is for: Anyone facing a deadline that matters with no team behind them.
“What are we already doing that another institution, customer, employer, or system might pay for?”
Result: A desk-screened set of mission-aligned revenue possibilities — including a straight recommendation against any the evidence does not support.
Who it is for: Organizations too dependent on grants and unwilling to distort the mission to fix it.
“How can this community garden create revenue or attract capital without distorting its purpose?”
Result: An economic and capital plan built for your actual garden, organization, geography, and market.
Who it is for: Growers and land stewards being asked to justify the land in dollars.
“Help me design the program and show me who has a reason to pay for it.”
Result: Program architecture, evidence, health-system and public-health fit where supported, partners, funding routes, and an implementation plan — together.
Who it is for: Food and health organizations sitting at the edge of the health-care dollar without a way in.
“Our work creates more value than 'youth development.' Show me what is legitimately inside it.”
Result: A portfolio of defensible capital propositions already inside your program. We surface what the evidence carries, and tell you where it runs out.
Who it is for: Youth organizations whose full value is not yet visible in how the program is financed.
“Corporations say they support work like ours. Help me build something they actually have a reason to finance.”
Result: A corporate proposition tied to documented business, workforce, employee, community, or institutional value.
Who it is for: Organizations tired of being a logo on a table tent.
“I do not understand DAFs and wealth philanthropy well enough to enter those rooms confidently.”
Result: A larger-gift case, DAF readiness, legitimate wealth-access routes, meeting preparation, and stewardship architecture.
Who it is for: Founders about to sit across from real money for the first time.
These are the DSG products you can pay for today at a published price. Everything else in the Store is scoped with a person before anything is charged.
One DSG-reviewed Capital Intelligence Brief™ on the room you are walking into.
Self-directed
You work the five stations. The system holds the structure and marks what is missing.
With DSG review
The same build, then a Capital Architect reads it and returns corrections before you submit.
Self-directed
You build it. We structure it and flag what the source does not state.
With DSG review
A Capital Architect reviews the package against the local decision process.
Hybrid — human review required
Worked together end to end. Compliance interpretation and narrative alignment are reviewed by a Capital Architect.
One organization, six weeks, virtual-first, leading into GivingTuesday.
A researched set of specific opportunities worth your time, with what each one actually requires. Optional — buy it only if you do not already have an opportunity.
Eight guided modules that end in a Sustainability Plan built from your real numbers.
Take one project to funding with a Capital Architect in the room.
Scope and price are confirmed with a person before anything is charged.
Not ready to buy today? Get Capital Signal™, Field Notes, and occasional notes from DSG.
We use your details only to send DSG publications and to know who is in the room. No spam, no sharing. Leave anytime. Privacy.
Start with Know the Room™. Tell us who you are approaching or what you are trying to get done, and we will tell you what the room needs to see.
Deena Strategic Group is an operating prototype for fair philanthropy: a working system, used by real organizations, that makes community-created value legible to capital and asks capital to widen what it can read as value.
Underneath the products sits a new SROI architecture — Social Return on Investment rebuilt so that community-created value counts, and so that no number is published as proof unless a person can show where it came from.
You are not behind. You are under-translated. The work of this system is translation and truth-keeping: say what the evidence carries, name what it does not, and never dress a gap as a finding.
If you are building the next generation of this work — an organization, a funder, a researcher, a builder — you are invited in. The architecture is meant to be used and argued with, not admired.